Students investigate the formation, physical and chemical properties of ice cores to determine the cause of a discrepant event.
Scientists analyze ice cores for evidence of climate history.
This activity is based on known events: 1783's Laki volcano in Iceland, an "unknown" in 1810 and the Mount Tambora eruption in 1815.
Can you imagine a "Year Without a Summer"? Both historians and scientists have found that in 1816 environmental conditions caused temperatures to drop abnormally, more than half a degree Celsius. This was enough to kill animals and crops in the northern hemisphere, to reduce the amount of sunlight due to persistent fog, and to have ice and snow forming in Europe in July and August. Conditions were so grim that author Mary Shelley holed up inside her holiday hotel and competed with friends to see who could create the scariest story. The result? Frankenstein! Figuring out what caused these events and whether they were a random occurrence is the job of climate scientists. To discover an answer, they begin with a question.
Question: "What caused the extreme 1816 summer conditions?"
Hypothesis: There may be ice core evidence of something that caused unusual temperatures.
What We Know: Snow crystals form differently under different conditions. In the center of Greenland, snow falls year round and does not melt. Layers get compressed into ice over time.
Task 1: Using your hand lens, examine the photos in the handout. How are the snowflakes different?
Dendritic flakes, far left, form when air is moist and warm. Colder, drier conditions produce finer, needle-like crystals, such as the third photo from the left in the handout.
Task 2: Sulfuric volcano emissions can be transported to the poles and fall onto the ice. For this simulation, sugar represents coarser summer snow, salt represents finer, winter snow, pepper represents ash and the cylinder represents the core. Sprinkle a few grains of each substance onto separate squares of black paper and examine them with your lens. What do you observe?
Working together, create a model ice core, using a spoon and funnel to manipulate the materials.
- Layer 1: Form the base of your core by adding summer snow to a thickness that you can clearly see, for example 10 ml.
- Layer 2: Add winter snow on top of the summer snow. These two layers represent evidence of one year of precipitation.
- Alternate summer and winter layers, filling the cylinder. Occasionally add evidence of an eruption, thick enough so you can see it when you are finished. Examine the "core". What do you observe?
How does the thickness of each layer relate to the weather at the time the snow fell? How does it relate to crystal size? In which layer(s) is there evidence of a volcanic event? How many years of accumulation are indicated in your model? Which layer is the oldest?
What We Need to Know: In addition to physical properties we can observe, snow also contains chemical indicators we can't see that give clues to the environment when the snow fell.
Designing an Investigation: Scientists designed two expeditions to search for evidence of sulfur in ice cores. The first expedition went to Summit Station, Greenland and the second to West Antarctica.
Task 3: Analyzing Data Review the graph in the handout. How many eruptions were indicated, during which year(s)? Which volcanoes were equitorial (sulfur distributed over both hemispheres)? Which were located in a mid- or high latitude location (deposited near the volcanic site only)?
Drawing Conclusions: Scientists were able to pinpoint ice cores from 1816 using physical and chemical means. You have examined evidence of volcanic eruptions from the same period. Could ash in the atmosphere have been a major factor, blocking northern hemisphere sunlight and causing a "Year Without a Summer"?
Linda M. Morris
Education Program Manager
Ice Drilling Program Office
Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth
linda.m.morris [at] dartmouth.edu
For more information visit:
This program is supported by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed by this program are those of the PIs and coordinating team, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.