Overview
This lesson will provide students with an opportunity to design and carry out an experiment that mimics the conditions causing accelerated ice melt along the face of the Thwaites Glacier off the southwest coast of Antarctica. Created by Sarah Slack during her expedition to Thwaites aboard the icebreaker Nathaniel B. Palmer, this activity aligns with the Science and Engineering practices of giving students the opportunity to develop their own investigations and to communicate their results. It can be completed either at school or at home using materials that most families will have on hand.
Objectives
At the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
- Design and carry out an investigation to test the rate at which ice melts in air vs. water
- Analyze why the results of their investigation are applicable to Thwaites Glacier, or to the Arctic or Antarctic cryosphere
- Communicate why melting ice is impactful for people in their community
Lesson Preparation
The Laws of Thermodynamics explain that ice will melt more rapidly in water than in air, but students won’t need a deep understanding of thermal properties in order to design an experiment to test this situation themselves. Teachers will need ice and (ideally) enough space in a refrigerator to let that ice melt in either air or in water. They will also need a way to quantify the change in size of an ice cube over time. If students have access to a ruler or (better yet) a kitchen scale at home, this experiment would be easy to conduct remotely. The video, “Antarctica Melting” provides an excellent introduction to the situation at Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica, but you might have to work with your students to understand the ways in which melting glaciers will impact communities around the world- especially coastal communities in low-lying areas.
Procedure
- Watch “Antarctica Melting: Journey to the Doomsday Glacier” on YouTube-
- Discuss: why does it matter (to us here, to people everywhere) if an Antarctic glacier melts? What factors affect the rate at which the glacier melts?
- Share this infographic of the structure of the Thwaites Glacier (https://www.carbonbrief.org/the-carbon-brief-interview-prof-jonathan-bamber/how-warm-ocean-water-can-cause-the-grounding-line-to-retreat). Thwaites is particularly vulnerable to melting because warm water is able to breach the grounding line and flow downslope at the bottom edge of the glacier.
- Challenge students to design an experiment that will show whether water melts more rapidly when exposed to air or water at the same temperature. How can they investigate which factor- warming air or warming ocean water- is having a greater impact on the stability of Thwaites Glacier?
Although there are many possible ways to focus in on an answer to our experimental question, an ideal experiment should have one ice cube resting in a pool of water, and a similar ice cube in the air that is the same temperature as that water. Students should have a way to quantify any change in the size of the ice cube over time- either by measuring with a ruler or taking the mass. Setting up the experiment to run in a refrigerator does a better job of mimicking conditions at the poles. Students could be asked to critique or carry out the experiments designed by their peers.
Extension
This relatively simple activity allows students to see one factor affecting the melt rate of glaciers. Using the same types of materials, they could also investigate whether large or small ice cubes melt more rapidly (in terms of losing a percentage of their starting size), whether multiple ice cubes in the same container change the melting rate, or if the ice cube melts differently in salt vs. freshwater. More advanced students could conduct research into the Circumpolar Deep Water and how this current is affecting the stability of Thwaites Glacier and of the entire West Antarctic ice sheet.
Transferability
This activity, because it involves relatively low-tech materials, could easily be conducted at home. However, it does require some wait time (to allow the ice to melt) and therefore would not be appropriate for a short-duration informal education program.
Assessment
Students should be assessed on the quality of the lab activity they design. This can be done by either using the attached rubric or through a process of peer review (which should include having other students conduct the experiment as written).
Author/Credits
Sarah Slack, 2019 PolarTREC Teacher
JHS 223 - The Montauk School
Brooklyn, NY
sarahjslack [at] gmail.com
Standards Other
NGSS Standards
MS-PS3-4: Plan an investigation to determine the relationships among the energy transferred, the type of matter, the mass, and the change in the average kinetic energy of the particles as measured by the temperature of the sample.
• Science and Engineering Practices: o Modelling – Use and/or construct models to predict, explain, and/or collect data to test ideas about phenomena in natural or designed systems o Planning and carrying out investigations to answer questions or test solutions to problems – Plan and carry out investigations, identifying independent and dependent variables and controls • Crosscutting Concepts: o Energy and matter o Cause and effect • Disciplinary Core Ideas: o The amount of energy transfer needed to change the temperature of a matter sample by a given amount depends on the nature of the matter, the size of the sample, and the environment (MS-PS3-4).
Polar Literacy Principles
Principle #5: The Poles are experiencing the effects of climate change at an accelerating rate.
• 5C: The Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is the fastest winter-warming region in the world (about 10 times faster than the global average) o 5C-2: The warming Southern Ocean flows close to the WAP, causing melting at the ice shelves and the base of glaciers. This accelerates the WAP glacier melt and collapse.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Download Full Lesson (PDF)773.15 KB | 773.15 KB |
Download Lesson Materials - Rubric & Diagram178.09 KB | 178.09 KB |
This program is supported by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed by this program are those of the PIs and coordinating team, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.